Search for: "JOHN DOE(S) 1-999" Results 1 - 20 of 41
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Apr 2015, 6:38 pm by Jon Markman
Public”, “John Doe” and “John Smith” all showed up, along with “NoneNone”, “first_last” and, in the case of 80 TVBDs, “Meld test”. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 11:27 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
’” Johns Hopkins Univ. v. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 2:57 pm by familoo
This is a guest post written by Sarah Phillimore (@svphillimore), a barrister at St Johns Chambers. [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 5:45 am by John Elwood
John Elwood reviews Monday’s relists. [read post]
2 May 2014, 12:28 pm by John Elwood
John Elwood reviews Monday’s relisted cases. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 9:47 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
We thus affirm the district court’s grant of Pearl River’s motion for JMOL that it did not misappropriate Trade Secret #1 Thus, Pearl River wins.Pearl River was represented by JOHN T. [read post]
22 Jul 2009, 6:00 am
Contact Steven Peck's Premier Legal toll free at 1-866-999-9085 and at www.premierlegal.org to talk to an experienced elder law attorney. [read post]
7 May 2024, 7:43 am by centerforartlaw
The amicus brief focuses on the importance of the case for artists and freedom of expression, framing the February ruling as a threat to the First Amendment.[38] Specifically, the coalition seeks the court’s clarification that an artist’s intent to sell or otherwise commercialize their art does not impact the balancing test between trademark owners’ rights and artists’ rights.[39] In an interesting comparison, the brief notes that… [read post]
20 Feb 2022, 2:19 pm by Keith Mallinson
” Figure 1: Overview of measures of alleged opportunistic conduct by SEP enforcers Opportunistic behavior (Table 1 sequence, Table 3 numbering) [8] Description[9](emphasis added) Rebuttal[10] 1. [read post]
21 Jun 2007, 11:10 am
We're told that the industry bribes doctors in various ways (pp. 984-85, 996-97 999-1001). [read post]
27 Nov 2013, 10:28 am by Ann Tweedy
  The main issues in the case are (1) whether the Oneida Indian Reservation in New York has been diminished or disestablished (despite a 1985 Supreme Court holding that New York’s 1795 land purchase from the Tribe was void because it had not been federally ratified) (2) and whether the Tribe’s sovereign immunity bars foreclosure of its land for nonpayment of taxes. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 5:15 am
There, ACT sued ten John Doe defendants based on allegedly defamatory comments posted anonymously on `Random Convergence,’ an internet blog administered by Daniel Drasin, located at http:// randomconvergence.blogspot.com/ (the `Blog’). [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
  CITATION TO A SUMMARY ORDER FILED ON OR AFTER JANUARY 1, 2007, IS PERMITTED AND IS GOVERNED BY FEDERAL RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 32.1 AND THIS COURT’S LOCAL RULE 32.1.1. [read post]
28 Feb 2006, 11:42 pm
It ruled that Dial-A-Mattress could establish secondary meaning in connection with its application for the mark 1-888-M-A-T-R-E-S-S, based upon the acquired distinctiveness of its legally equivalent mark (212) M-A-T-T-R-E-S (shown above). [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 7:16 am
John with the Leavenworth Police Department testified he created a photo lineup that included pictures of Gauger and five other individuals with similar characteristics. [read post]